Decisions on women’s claims for international protection from domestic violence, including Lazo-Majano (1987), Islam and Shah (1999) and Refugee Appeal No. 76044 (2008) have generated strands of case law which both contradict each other and the Refugee Convention’s object and purpose. Adjudicators have delineated overly restrictive social groups and ignored, identified, or imputed a range of political opinions. A disproportionate focus on ‘private’ motives has also obscured the nexus between persecution and the Convention ground(s).
Emissions from Israel’s war in Gaza have ‘immense’ effect on climate catastrophe
Towards Effective Regulation: AI, Misinformation, and Democratic Challenges
Is the world losing faith in democracy?
Faisal Hamid
Faisal researches the Political Economy of Islam in Nigeria. He also serves as a Senior Strategy Analyst at Harvard University.
Before starting his doctorate, Faisal was a senior administrator at Zaytuna College in Berkeley, CA, and a Senior Strategy Consultant with Monitor Deloitte. He earned his BA from Yale and MA from Johns Hopkins SAIS.
How will Briton's vote in the next election?
Francesco Raffaelli
Daniel Lane Martin
Daniel Lane is a first year DPhil student in European Politics at New College. His research interests include coalition politics, political behaviour, party politics and populism in Southern Europe.
Benjamin Harack
Ben studies the potential for artificial intelligence (AI) to trigger a world war and how to prevent that from happening.