2011

Mclean, I. and Peterson, S. (2011) “A uniform British establishment”, in M. Chapman, J. Maltby, and W. Whyte (eds.) The established church: past, present and future. T & T Clark, pp. 141–157.
Johnson, D. and Tierney, D. (2011) “The Rubicon Theory of War: How the Path to Conflict Reaches the Point of No Return”, International Security, 36(1), pp. 7–40.
Raile, E., Pereira, C. and Power, T. (2011) “The Executive Toolbox: Building Legislative Support in a Multiparty Presidential Regime”, Political Research Quarterly, 64(2), pp. 323–334.
PETERSON, S. (2011) “National Religion and the Prayer Book Controversy, 1927–1928 – By John Maiden”, Parliamentary History, 30(2), pp. 279–280.
Thornton, P. (2011) “Retrofitting the steel frame: from mobilizing the masses to surveying the public”, in E. Perry and S. Heilmann (eds.) Mao’s Invisible Hand: The Political Foundations of Adaptive Governance in China. Harvard University Council on Asian Studies.
Peterson, S. (2011) “Crown Rights of the Redeemer: The spiritual freedom of the Church of Scotland. Marjory Maclean. St Andrew Press, Edinburgh, 2009, 224 pp (£25.00) ISBN: 978-0-7152-0877-9”, Ecclesiastical Law Journal, 13(2), pp. 239–241.
Frazer, E. and Hutchings, K. (2011) “Remnants and Revenants: Politics and Violence in the Work of Agamben and Derrida”, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 13(2), pp. 127–144.
Miller, D. (2011) “Taking up the Slack? responsibility and justice in situations of partial compliance”, in C. Knight and Z. Stemplowska (eds.) Responsibility and Distributive Justice. Oxford Univ Pr.
Musselin, C. et al. (2011) “Symposium sur Inventing Equal Opportunity de Frank Dobbin”, Sociologie du Travail, 53(2), pp. 194–215.
Pinto‐Duschinsky, M., McLean, I. and Lodge, G. (2011) “The Alternative Vote”, Political Insight, 2(1), pp. 16–17.
Musselin, C. et al. (2011) “Symposium sur Inventing Equal Opportunity de Frank Dobbin”, Sociologie du Travail, 53(2), pp. 194–215.
Smith, R., King, D. and Klinkner, P. (2011) “Challenging History: Barack Obama & American Racial Politics”, Daedalus, 140(2), pp. 121–135.
Finlayson, A. and Frazer, E. (2011) “Fictions of Sovereignty: Shakespeare, Theatre and the Representation of Rule”, Parliamentary Affairs, 64(2), pp. 233–247.
Tilley, J. and Hobolt, S. (2011) “Is the Government to Blame? An Experimental Test of How Partisanship Shapes Perceptions of Performance and Responsibility”, The Journal of Politics, 73(2), pp. 316–330.
Frazer, E. and Hutchings, K. (2011) “Virtuous Violence and the Politics of Statecraft in Machiavelli, Clausewitz and Weber”, Political Studies, 59(1), pp. 56–73.
Caplan, R. (2011) “Seeing the Responsibility to Protect in Perspective”, Ethnopolitics, 10(1), pp. 129–132.
Johnson, D. (2011) “Why God is the best punisher”, Religion Brain & Behavior, 1(1), pp. 77–84.
Zucco, C. and Power, T. (2011) “Bolsa Família and the Shift in Lula’s Electoral Base, 2002-2006: A Reply to Bohn”, SSRN Electronic Journal.
Zucco, C. and Power, T. (2011) “Elite Preferences in a Consolidating Democracy: The Brazilian Legislative Surveys, 1990-2009”, SSRN Electronic Journal.
Leopold, D. (2011) “A Solitary Life”, in MAX STIRNER, pp. 21–41.
Frazer, E. and Hutchings, K. (2011) “Avowing violence: Foucault and Derrida on politics, discourse and meaning”, Philosophy & Social Criticism, 37(1), pp. 3–23.
Mclean, I. (2011) “1647. 1911. 2011: what are the lessons of previous attempts to reform the House of Lords?”, in A. Fitzpatrick (ed.) The end of the peer show?: responses to the draft Bill on Lords reform. CentreForum, pp. 30–40.
McLean, I. and Peterson, S. (2011) “Entrenching the establishment and free exercise of religion in the written U.K. constitution”, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 9(1), pp. 230–250.
Johnson, D., Weidmann, N. and Cederman, L.-E. (2011) “Fortune favours the bold: an agent-based model reveals adaptive advantages of overconfidence in war”., PloS one, 6(6), p. e20851.
Macfarlane, S. (2011) “The Evolution of US Policy towards the Southern Caucasus”, in NON-TRADITIONAL SECURITY THREATS AND REGIONAL COOPERATION IN THE SOUTHERN CAUCASUS, pp. 107–124.