Since 2008, the European Union has been engulfed in several crises. While distinct, these crises are feeding into each other and are testing the capacity and resilience of EU and member states, bringing forward common policy questions and new forms of cooperation. The permanent character of this state of crisis has made analysts talk about our times as the age of permacrisis. As a result, a trend towards a new mode of ‘coordinative Europeanization’ in EU decision-making has been observed since the Covid-19 crisis.

This workshop addresses the contemporary challenges facing deliberative citizens' assemblies. As these mechanisms face evolving social, political, and global dynamics, it is imperative for academics, public officials, and global civil society actors to critically assess and adapt. This workshop highlights the need for a comprehensive examination of these challenges and underlines the importance of formulating innovative perspectives to respond effectively.

Annette Lareau discusses the tensions in how researchers approach the design for qualitative data. Emphasizing the need for depth and richness in the data, as well as a systematic discussion of conceptual issues, Lareau calls for limiting variability in data collection by making very hard choices. By focusing on specific class, race, or gender groups, and limiting the number of these groups, researchers have a greater possibility of creating very high-quality data.

Why is the gender gap in support for internationalism in Western Europe closing? Traditionally, women have been less supportive of processes of globalization - including free trade and European integration - than men. However, over the last two decades, this gender gap has been shrinking in several countries.

As countries of strategic importance on opposing sides of the Cold War divide, the domestic and foreign policies of the German Democratic Republic (GDR) and Japan were expected to align closely with those of their respective superpower hegemons. At the same time, West Germany’s Hallstein Doctrine threatened to cut ties with any country that recognized the GDR as a legitimate state, severely restricting East Germany from establishing diplomatic relationships with states outside of the Soviet sphere of influence.

Abstract will be posted shortly.

https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_MmZhMGI0OWEtOGFmNC00YmYxLWE4MTMtNzIyNzE2MmUxMTEx%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%22cc95de1b-97f5-4f93-b4ba-fe68b852cf91%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%226cfc1a9d-4d4a-4cbe-b726-6ec476a74653%22%7d

Recent weaponized interdependence research has focused on mapping international economic structures to explain states’ capacity to inflict costs on foreign actors. This paper proposes a different approach that integrates weaponized interdependence research with microeconomic concepts of substitution. If an international economic exchange is restricted, actors on either end turn to the best available alternative. Substitution costs describe the utility loss actors incur when doing so. The extent of these costs determines whether either side can ‘weaponize’ the exchange.

Join us for the 7th Adrian Fernando Memorial Lecture on Tuesday, 30 April 2024, featuring Howard Covington as the keynote speaker.

AI and Climate Change
17.00 – 18.10 BST: Lecture and Q&A
18.10 – 19.10 BST: Reception

Please be aware that group attendance may be limited. Please contact Group Lead Christopher Morris or team (christopher.morris@politics.ox.ac.uk) for attendance and inquiries. Seminar details are confirmed a week in advance.