Fighting corruption, curbing cynicism?

In 2005 an investigation in Brazil brought to light corruption within the governing Workers’ Party and resulted in the conviction of major figures. An even larger enquiry launched in 2014— lava-jato —revealed a money-laundering scheme involving 28 of Brazil’s 34 political parties. This investigation spread to other Latin American countries, often wreaking havoc.

Some argue that anti-corruption judicial activism uproots cultures of impunity. In theory these investigations unsettle corrupt ecosystems and make political regeneration possible. However, others say that judges can reinforce political cynicism or bolster begrudging tolerance for what they authoritatively corroborate is endemic.

Despite the renewed protagonism of courts in the fight against corruption in Latin America, little research has been done on its perceived legitimacy, or the extent to which it leads to positive or negative changes in public attitudes towards corruption and politics. 

This project, by Ezequiel Gonzalez Ocantos, Associate Professor in the Qualitative Study of Comparative Political Institutions, will explore two competing stories: Does judicial accountability mobilise voters and curb their tolerance for corruption? Or does it fuel cynicism about politics?

The research will include surveys and focus groups that study how information about anti-corruption judicial activism affects public attitudes and behaviours, including emotions, tolerance for corruption, political cynicism, and support for populist outsiders.