Zoom: https://bsg.zoom.us/j/91663686066?pwd=QWNHVEY4YzhWMUtvMHZmN0RKQWsyQT09
Meeting ID: 916 6368 6066
Passcode: 322203
Meeting ID: 916 6368 6066
Passcode: 322203
(joint work with Luis R. Martínez, U. Chicago)
Abstract: Political fiscal cycles are pervasive across democracies; there is the use of the public purse for political gain close to election dates. What policies are there to stop the political fiscal cycles and are they effective? Using contract-level microdata for the entire Colombian state, we study the effects of a regulation that forbids contracting at all levels of government in the four months before the 2018 national elections. We find that there is substantial bunching in spending in the weeks immediately before the regulation comes into effect. These last-minute contracts: (i) disproportionately benefit previous local political candidates. Using text analysis for matching, we find that: (ii) these contracts disproportionately go to contractors without previous experience, and (iii) have more time extensions and over-costs. As part of our analysis of mechanisms, we show that the bunching is related to low institutional capacity and that contracts in the bunching period are increasingly targeted to high vote-performing politicians. Overall, we find that forbidding contracting actual creates a displacement of the political fiscal cycle rather than stopping it.
Abstract: Political fiscal cycles are pervasive across democracies; there is the use of the public purse for political gain close to election dates. What policies are there to stop the political fiscal cycles and are they effective? Using contract-level microdata for the entire Colombian state, we study the effects of a regulation that forbids contracting at all levels of government in the four months before the 2018 national elections. We find that there is substantial bunching in spending in the weeks immediately before the regulation comes into effect. These last-minute contracts: (i) disproportionately benefit previous local political candidates. Using text analysis for matching, we find that: (ii) these contracts disproportionately go to contractors without previous experience, and (iii) have more time extensions and over-costs. As part of our analysis of mechanisms, we show that the bunching is related to low institutional capacity and that contracts in the bunching period are increasingly targeted to high vote-performing politicians. Overall, we find that forbidding contracting actual creates a displacement of the political fiscal cycle rather than stopping it.